GMO versus NON GMO – The Shocking Corn Comparison

gmo corn

The claims that “There is no difference between GMO corn and NON GMO corn” are false. (See the photo below) 

A 2012 study, called the Corn Comparison Report, was recently released by Profit Pro and published on the website for Moms Across America March to Label GMOs – a group dedicated to raising awareness about the dangers of genetically modified organisms.

The Corn Comparison Report detailed the nutritional deficiencies of GMO corn compared to regular organic corn. The report reveals the stunning levels of glyphosate in GMO corn and the amount of vital nutrients that have been drawn out.

There is a clear difference between the nutritional value of GMO corn and NON GMO corn. This isn’t surprising as glyphosate draws out the vital nutrients of living things; and GMO corn is covered with it.

The important thing to note in these deficiencies is that these are exactly the deficiencies in a human being that lead to susceptibility to sickness, disorders and cancer. People who have osteoporosis are low in calcium and magnesium, people who have cancer are low in manganese. The list goes on and on.

GMO Corn has 14 ppm of Calcium and NON GMO corn has 6130 ppm: 437 X more.

GMO corn has 2 ppm of Magnesium and NON GMO corn has 113ppm: 56 X more.

GMO corn has 2 ppm of Manganese and NON GMO corn has 14ppm: 7 X more.

gmo corn vs non gmo corn
Crazy levels of Formaldehyde and Glyphosate found in the GMO corn!

The EPA standards for glyphosate in water in America is .7ppm. European Tests showed organ damage to animals at .1ppb (.0001ppm) of glyphosate in water. Our water levels allow glyphosate 7,000X higher than what has been shown to be toxic in animals. This corn has 13 ppm! 130,000 times higher than what is toxic in water!*

In a past study it was shown that .97 ppm of formaldehyde was toxic when injested by animals. This corn has 200X that! That is why the animals don’t eat the GMO corn because they can smell the formaldehyde! Pretty sick huh?

See Original Report Here

11 Comments on GMO versus NON GMO – The Shocking Corn Comparison

  1. It opened fine for me. While I prefer organic, citing such a questionable non-peer reviewed “study” does not add credibility to the cause. It shows a bias and an agenda. This corn could very well be a killer. We simply don’t know. We do know that the companies that make this stuff are in it for the money. That alone is enough for me to steer clear of their products. But, to be taken seriously, there needs to be real studies that are subjected to the scrutiny of peer review.

  2. Alas, I have problems with this information, a growing concern in the social media universe. This link is hearsay, and touted by RT (Russia Today). It could well be valid, but there is no link to the actual report, no way to know if its conclusions are replicatable.

    • I think there would be more social acceptance of this problem if it was in the media. It’s a very valid concern. It was all new to me up until a few months ago and I’ve been researching it everyday. If you like Linda, you can friend me, I do a lot of posts about it. I’m so happy that you are even aware of the possibility. I just went through this with my mom and sister. My mom trusted the government and major food suppliers to provide us with good nutrition.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.